ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi

But this time I get The firmware encountered an unexpected exception. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. la imagen iso,bin, etc debe ser de 64 bits sino no la reconoce Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. If I am using Ventoy and I went the trouble of enrolling it for Secure Boot, I don't expect it to suddenly flag any unsigned or UEFI bootloader or bootloader with a broken signature, as bootable in a Secure Boot enabled environment. Ventoy supports ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files using an exFAT filesystem. If you use the Linux kernel's EFI stub loader or ELILO, you may need to store your kernel on the ESP, so creating an ESP on the large end of the scale is advisable. Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB Snail LInux , supports UEFI , booting successfully. wifislax64-2.1-final.iso - 2 GB, obarun-JWM-2020.03.01-x86_64.iso - 1.6 GB, MiniTool_Partition_Wizard_10.2.3_Technician_WinPE.iso - 350 MB, artix-cinnamon-s6-20200210-x86_64.iso - 1.88 GB, Parrot-security-4.8_x64.iso - 4.03 GB So thanks a ton, @steve6375! Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. For instance, someone could produce a Windows installation ISO that contains a malicious /efi/boot/bootx64.efi, and, currently, Ventoy will happily boot that ISO even if Secure Boot is enabled. Option 3: only run .efi file with valid signature. Questions about Grub, UEFI,the liveCD and the installer. () no boot file found for uefi. Now, if Microsoft finally relinquished their abusive policy about not accepting GPLv3 code for Secure Boot signing and Ventoy was updated not to allow unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled (i.e. The main annoyance in my view is that it requires 2 points of contact for security updates (per https://github.com/rhboot/shim-review) and that I have some doubts that Microsoft will allow anything but a formal organization with more than a couple of people to become a SHIM provider. UEFi64? Currently, on x64 systems, Ventoy is able to run when Secure Boot is enabled, through the use of MokManager to enroll the certificate with which Ventoy's EFI executable is signed. It should be the default of Ventoy, which is the point of this issue. So the new ISO file can be booted fine in a secure boot enviroment. Boot net installer and install Debian. I'll try looking into the changelog on the deb package and see if @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. If you burn the image to a CD, and use a USB CD drive, I bet you find it will install fine. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? Rename it as MemTest86_64.efi (or something similar). Have a question about this project? Of course, there are ways to enable proper validation. So use ctrl+w before selecting the ISO. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. Yet, that is technically what Ventoy does if you enrol it for Secure Boot, as it makes it look like any bootloader, that wasn't signed by Microsoft, was signed by Microsoft. ElementaryOS boots just fine. *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. Users may run into issues with Ventoy not working because of corrupt ISO files, which will create problems when booting an image file. Tried with archlinux-2021.05.01-x86_64 which is listed as compatible and it is working flawlessly. Remain what in the install program Ventoy2Disk.exe . Yes. 2.-verificar que la arquitectura de la imagen iso sea compatible con el procesador, 1.-modo uefi: However, because no additional validation is performed after that, this leaves system wild open to malicious ISOs. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. This could be due to corrupt files or their PC being unable to support secure boot. Thnx again. Indeed I have erroneously downloaded memtest v4 because I just read ".iso" and went for it. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. Tried the same ISOs in Easy2Boot and they worked for me. Download non-free firmware archive. However, users have reported issues with Ventoy not working properly and encountering booting issues. And for good measure, clone that encrypted disk again. ? Exactly. Format XFS in Linux: sudo mkfs -t xfs /dev/sdb1, It may be related to the motherboard USB 2.0/3.0 port. Maybe because of partition type Posts: 15 Threads: 4 Joined: Apr 2020 Reputation: 0 0 However, considering that in the case of Ventoy, you are basically going to chain load GRUB 2, and that most of the SHIMs have been designed to handle precisely that, it might be easier to get Ventoy accepted as a shim payload. This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. You are receiving this because you commented. https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. While Ventoy is designed to boot in with secure boot enabled, if your computer does not support the secure boot feature, then an error will result. I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. That's not at all how I see it (and from what I read above also not @ventoy sees it). But when I try to boot it with ventoy it does not boot and says the message "No bootfile found for UEFI". # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . Also, what GRUB theme are you using? EndeavourOS_Atlantis_neo-21_5.iso boots OK using UEFI64 on Ventoy and grubfm. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Yep, the Rescuezilla v2.4 thing is not a problem with Ventoy. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. How to Perform a Clean Install of Windows 11. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? @steve6375 Okay thanks. This will disable validation policy override, making Secure Book work as desired: it will load only signed files (+ files signed with SHIM MOK key). Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? | 5 GB, void-live-x86_64-20191109-xfce.iso | 780 MB, refracta10-beta5_xfce_amd64-20200518_0033.iso | 800 MB, devuan_beowulf_3.0.0_amd64_desktop-live.iso | 1.10 GB, drbl-live-xfce-2.6.2-1-amd64.iso | 800 MB, kali-linux-2020-W23-live-amd64.iso | 2.88 GB, blackarch-linux-live-2020.06.01-x86_64.iso | 14 GB, cucumber-linux-1.1-x86_64-basic.iso | 630 MB, BlankOn-11.0.1-desktop-amd64.iso | 1.8 GB, openmamba-livecd-en-snapshot-20200614.x86_64.iso | 1.9 GB, sol-11_3-text-x86.iso | 600 MB Of course , Added. Win10UEFI+GPTWin10UEFIWin7 There are many kinds of WinPE. Format Ext4 in Linux: sudo mkfs -t ext4 /dev/sdb1 I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. Unable to boot properly. Can I reformat the 1st (bigger) partition ? Is it valid for Ventoy to be able to run user scripts, inject user files into Linux/Windows ram disks, change .cfg files in 'secure' ISOs, etc. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. You signed in with another tab or window. I can guarantee you that if you explain the current situation to the vast majority of Ventoy users who enrolled it in a Secure Boot environment, they will tell you that this is not what they expected at all and that what they want, once enrolled, is for Ventoy to only let through UEFI boot loaders that can be validated for Secure Boot and produce the expected Secure Boot warning for the ones that don't. 3. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Ventoy version and details of options chosen when making it (Legacy\MBR\reserved space) Yes, I finally managed to get UEFI:NTFS Secure Boot signed 2 days ago, and that's part of why there's a new release of Rufus today, that includes the signed version of UEFI:NTFS. Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. If Secure Boot is not enabled, proceed as normal. 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. You can copy several ISO files at a time, and Ventoy will offer a boot menu where you can select them. Installation & Boot. When ventoy detects this file, it will not search the directory and all the subdirectories for iso files. I suspect that, even as we are not there yet, this is something that we're eventually going to see (but most likely as a choice for the user to install the fully secured or partially secured version of the OS), culminating in OSes where every single binary that runs needs to be signed, and for the certificates those binaries are signed with to be in the chain of trust of OS. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. No bootfile found for UEFI! sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> That's because, if they did want to boot non Secure Boot enabled ones, they would disable Secure Boot themselves. Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community. . Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU. can u fix now ? Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. If anyone has an issue - please state full and accurate details. Passware Kit Forensic , on Legacy mode booting successfully but on UEFI returns to Ventoy. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. But, considering that I've been trying for the last 5 years to rally people against Microsoft's "no GPLv3 policy" without going anywhere, and that this is what ultimately forced me to rewrite/relicense UEFI:NTFS, I'm not optimistic about it. However, I would say that, if you are already running "arbritrary" code in UEFI mode to display a user message, while Secure Boot is enabled, then you should be able to craft your own LoadImage()/StarImage() that doesn't go through SB validation (by copying the LoadImage()/StarImage() code from the EDK2 and removing the validation part). But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. Add firmware packages to the firmware directory. Any kind of solution? The only way to make Ventoy boot in secure boot is to enroll the key. Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. After install, the 1st larger partition is empty, and no files or directories in it. Some commands in Ventoy grub can modify the contents of the ISO and must be disabled for users to use on their own under secure boot. What's going on here? Remove Ventoy secure boot key. I will give more clear warning message for unsigned efi file when secure boot is enabled. However the solution is not perfect enough. The Flex image does not support BIOS\Legacy boot - only UEFI64. Secure Boot is tricky to deal with and can (rightfully) be seen as a major inconvenience instead of yet another usually desireable line of defence against malware (but by all means not a panacea). Windows 7 32-bit does not support UEFI32 - you must use Win7 64-bit.. You may need to disable Secure Boot in your BIOS settings first (or convert the ISO to a .imgPTN23 file using the MPI Tool Kit). Getting the same error with Arch Linux. Maybe I can get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. No. I think it's OK. PS: It works fine with original ventoy release (use UEFIinSecureBoot) when Secure boot is enabled. Because if I know you ever used Ventoy in a Secure Boot enabled environment, I can now run any malicious payload I want at the UEFI level, on your computer.

Borderline Blood Test Results Mean, Does Homeowners Insurance Cover Theft From Car, Articles V